Frontline Analysis of Terrorist Attacks of September 11 Essay

Bleeding edge Analysis of Terrorist Attacks of September 11 - Essay Example The principal contention that is point by point inside this program is the absence of correspondence between US associations, for example, the FBI and CIA. Previous FBI specialist, Ali Soufan is met in this program and he portrays how the CIA retained data from the FBI which could have halted the psychological oppressor assaults on September eleventh. As per Soufan, he mentioned data from the CIA on a few events before the assaults since he was taking a shot at another fear based oppressor assault that had happened on the USS Cole in Yemen and was battling to make sense of explicit associations between psychological militant groups(â€Å"The Interrogator,† 2011). In any case, the CIA disregarded the entirety of his solicitations, yet after September eleventh, 2001, they unexpectedly started to furnish him with reports and photos which, in the event that he had been offered access to these sources prior, he accepts that the FBI would have had the option to find the individuals associated with 9/11 and at last had the option to stop it. Ali Soufan didn't generally comprehend why he was disregarded before, however the vast majority assume that it had to do with miscommunication in that the CIA may have felt that the FBI and different organizations previously approached this information(â€Å"The Interrogator,† 2011). There is a ton of â€Å"what ifs† in this specific discussion as individuals envision what the United States and the world may appear as though today if these two significant organizations had been exceptional at speaking with one another. There were different issues with correspondence also when it came to cross examination strategies. Ali Soufan was one of the FBI’s principal investigative specialists in view of his capacity to communicate in Arabic. He had invested a lot of energy addressing fear based oppressor subjects; be that as it may, after September eleventh, 2001, the United States chose to start utilizing improv ed cross examination procedures which included water boarding, bareness, lack of sleep, and no toilets. Ali Soufan didn't concur with these procedures since he trusted them to be insufficient in contrast with his own strategy for addressing. At last, Soufan and others like him were supplanted by specialists in improved cross examination procedures. Soufan endeavored to convey his interests about this, yet nobody truly tuned in. He even talked before the legislature with his character disguised that there were a lot of models which outlined that methods like water-boarding accomplished more mischief than anything as fear based oppressors just give out bogus data so as to stop what some consider to be torture(â€Å"The Interrogator,† 2011). The debate here stems from the way that Soufan accepts that no huge data has been gathered from detained psychological oppressors utilizing these extreme cross examination methods. In any case, those on the opposite side of the contention, f or example, Dick Cheney, keep on safeguarding these strategies and state that they have had the option to upset numerous potential psychological militant assaults as a result of it. The normal American will never know reality since this controversey has all the earmarks of being to a greater extent a distinction of sentiment than all else with each side saying that the other isn't right. The normal American is likewise probably not going to know about the controversey that encompasses how much cash has been spent on counter-psychological oppression endeavors and a definitive effect that these endeavors have had on halting