Tourist Breaks Back on Sentosa Ride Law Analysis Essay Example for Free

Tourist Breaks Back on Sentosa Ride Law Analysis Essay Factual Summary of Case Australian tourist, Michael McCarthy, suffered a fall and broke his back while riding Sentosa’s MegaZip, which is a flying fox adventure ride run by Flying Dragon Adventures (FDA). The riders would initially slide down the zipline fast and would be slowed down by a braking mechanism as they approach the landing platform. However, in this case, McCarthy was travelling towards the landing platform at a faster speed than usual. As a result, he crashed onto the platform and broke several vertebrae in his back. He felt incredible pain and could not breathe for a minute and a half. McCarthy had no immediate medical help as there was no medical staff on-site. He only received assistance half an hour later and was taken to Singapore General Hospital 1 hour 15 minutes later. He received 35 stitches to his back and spent 5 days in and out of the intensive care unit. As for the ride, McCarthy satisfied safety requirements of being at least 0. 7m tall and less than 140kg in weight. This was the first accident in its two-year history of operation. Before the accident, the ride had been taken by at least 200,000 visitors in total and was already taken by 140 people on that day. Alexander Blyth, managing director of the ride, believed that all safety procedures were followed, that nothing failed and nothing snapped. The ride also requires customers to sign indemnity forms, in which contains an exemption clause that states that they are not responsible for any deaths or personal injuries unless through gross negligence. Blyth reported the case to the Building and Construction Authority (BCA), the regulatory body for amusement rides. Lawyers are attempting to seek compensation for McCarthy’s injuries, as they question the validity of the exclusion clause in the indemnity form by bringing up the Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA). Following McCarthy’s injuries, McCarthy wants to claim his recoverable losses. It can be assumed that FDA is using its exemption of liability clause as a defence. McCarthy’s lawyers are stating that the exemption clause is invalid under section 2(1) of the UCTA, which states that â€Å"a person cannot exclude or restrict liability for negligence in relation to personal injury or death†. The Contract Before riding, McCarthy was made to sign an indemnity form. The terms of the indemnity form could be regarded as the express terms of the contract between McCarthy and FDA. A contract was formed between both parties when McCarthy signed the indemnity form. Since, the express terms to the contract were introduced before the contract was formed, they are, prima facie, binding to both parties. There was an exemption clause in the contract stating that FDA is not responsible for any deaths or personal injuries unless through gross negligence. Crucial Questions Before we speculate on the legal outcome of the case, a few crucial questions have to be asked. 1. Was FDA negligent? If so, this would render their exemption clause invalid, and they will be made liable for McCarthy’s losses. 2. Did FDA breach any implied terms in the contract? 3. Is BCA liable to any extent? If so, to what extent? Before the crucial questions are asked, it is important to consider the section of The Amusement Ride Safety Act (2011) which states the scope of responsibilities of parties with statutory responsibilities. They are as follows. Parties with statutory responsibilities The Amusement Rides Safety Act (ARSA) defines statutory duties and liabilities for the following stakeholders to ensure proper accountability for the safety of rides: a. Person responsible (i. e. FDA): The person responsible, who is primarily the holder of an operating permit, will be the person who has the charge, management or control of the ride. He will have overall responsibilities for all matters concerning ride safety. b. Ride manager: The ride manager, who is employed by the holder of an operating permit, will manage and oversee daily and routine operations and maintenance of the ride. He has to possess prescribed technical qualifications and experience. c. Qualified person (QP): The qualified person, appointed by the applicant of the permit or the holder of the permit, will carry out specific technical duties, such as certifying technical compliance with design codes, supervising ride installation or modification and conducting annual inspections to ensure ride safety. Was FDA negligent? The court could question whether FDA was negligent in declaring the true safety limits of the ride and if the ride manager was negligent in handling the situation. The safety limit that was declared could have been that the system would not suffer any breakage or malfunction at the stipulated weight but the braking system was unable to be effectively utilized to ensure the safety of the user. In addition, the ride manager could arguably be negligent in the handling of the situation in not pulling on the emergency stop that should have been installed in every amusement ride to stop the ride in the event of an adverse incident. In the event that the ride manager had been negligent in due diligence, the ride manager would also be liable for breaching section 17(1)(a) or ARSA. There are a few possible outcomes regarding negligence on the part of the FDA, and the possibilities of each outcome will be examined. The first possibility is that the court could reason that the FDA was negligent in checking that the braking system was functioning properly and at optimal level. It could state that the braking mechanism is a very integral and crucial component to the system, and hence negligence in the area of ensuring the functionality of the braking system could amount to negligence in ensuring the safety of the system as a whole. In addition to this, the court could also rule the FDA was negligent in ensuring adequate safety limits for the ride. If this was the case, then it is likely FDA will be held fully liable for McCarthy’s recoverable losses. This is because its exemption clause would then be invalid, by virtue of section 2(1) of the UCTA. The second possibility could be that the court could consider contributory negligence as a defence. This however, would be almost impossible because it would be almost impossible for FDA to prove that there was a degree of negligence on the part of McCarthy. It was most likely that McCarthy had to comply with the necessary safety measures before riding, such as wearing a helmet and safety harness. As such, it would be almost impossible for the court to hold both McCarthy and FDA partially liable for McCarthy’s recoverable losses. Did FDA breach any implied terms? If FDA had breached any implied terms in the contract, and McCarthy suffered losses as a result, then it follows that McCarthy can sue FDA for his recoverable losses. The Duty of Care The duty of care can be an implied term in the contract between McCarthy and FDA, even if it was not expressly provided for in the contract. This term would be implied by statute, by virtue of section 13(1)(b)(i) of the ARSA. In addition to the exemption clause being invalid due to negligence, the courts could also rule that FDA’s negligence could have resulted in it breaching its duty of care when the braking mechanism failed to work properly and McCarthy was injured. Furthermore, despite the dangerous nature of the ride, FDA did not have an on-site medical team to ensure that immediate action could be taken in the event of an accident. This is a breach of an implied term for FDA to provide for the safety of its customers in the event of an adverse incident. This term is implied by statute; according to regulation 16(6)(b) of ARSA, â€Å"The operator of an amusement ride shall ensure that at all times when the amusement ride is in operation there are in attendance to render first aid when the necessity arises, a sufficient number of persons who are properly trained by a first aid training organisation acceptable to the Commissioner;† FDA can be held liable for McCarthy’s recoverable losses based on the breach of these implied terms alone. Is BCA liable? Under the ARSA, it states that all amusement rides has to be assessed and certified by a Qualified Person (QP), which must be an amusement ride specialist engineer registered under the Professional Engineers Board. However, as the MegaZip ride involves an aerial ropeway, it is further classified as a major amusement ride under the ARSA. With it being a major amusement ride, the QP is also required to engage and consider the advice and opinion of a conformity assessor (CA). The CA has to carry out procedures such as inspections, tests and certifications to determine if the design and specifications, the proposed installation method or programme or the proposed modification method or programme relating to a major amusement ride or the major modification thereof conform to any technical standard or requirement. Besides technical support, the CA will complement the qualified person with expertise in nontechnical but critical aspects of ride safety such as ride management (e. . layout of queue areas) and crowd control (e. g. access routes and barriers). In order to ascertain whether BCA is liable for the accident, it is important to determine if the accident arose as a result of: 1. QP and CA’s inadequate safety inspections, overlooking of fundamental technical faults and establishing poor safety standards during construction. 2. FDA’s lack of day-to-day management of ride safety. In order to ascertain if the accident occurred due to the QP and CA’s lack of rigorous inspection on the ride, we must determine if they approved the ride without proper assessment of its safety. If the accident arose due to the fault of QP and CA’s poor safety assessment and haphazard approval of the ride, then some degree of liability may fall onto the QP and CA. With this assumption, FDA could then argue that the accident was caused by the QP and CA’s negligence in highlighting and rectifying safety issues during construction. FDA could state that their ride was certified by the QP and CA, assuring FDA that the ride was acceptable and followed all safety aspects. In addition, if FDA was certified through a document of approval signed by the QP and CA, FDA could use this certification as evidence in court to back up their case. This is due to the fact that it would be unfair for FDA to take up the liability if we were to consider that FDA followed all of BCA’s ACRA requirements and sought necessary approval by the QP and CA for the ride. However, the possibility of the scenario above is rather small as it is most likely that at the point of construction, all safety limits proposed by the FDA met the safety requirements of BCA and that the QP and CA properly checked and certified the ride. As the QP and CA’s duties were only restricted to the period of construction, it was the FDA’s responsibility to ensure that the day-to-day operations of the ride were well within the safety limits and that regular maintenance was conducted on the ride. In addition, considering that the accident took place two years after the construction, it would be unfair to attribute blame onto BCA, as the ride would have undergone much wear and tear and weathering. Furthermore, BCA does not have proper control over FDA’s maintenance of safety standards beyond the initial construction phase of the ride. Also, as BCA is a statutory body in ensuring that operators of amusement rides complies with the safety regulations, it would be unreasonable to expect them to be responsible for all safeties of all rides at every point in time. In addition, its role does not extend to ensuring that the ride’s safety features are continuously maintained. As such, it is extremely difficult to hold BCA liable for the accident to any degree, because the onus lies on the FDA to ensure the constant safety of the rides beyond the construction phase. Our Final Evaluation In conclusion, it is highly likely that the court would rule out that FDA was negligent in verifying the safety of the ride, and hold FDA liable for McCarthy’s losses. Assuming McCarthy’s weight was within the true weight limit of the ride, and the braking system of the ride did malfunction on that day, it is most likely that FDA will be held liable as the onus of verifying the efficiency of the brakes is solely on FDA. Should the braking system have been working well that day, but McCarthy’s weight was not within the true weight limit of the ride, it is also most likely that FDA will be held liable in this case as the court can then rule that FDA was negligent in determining the true safety limits of the ride. In saying this, we are assuming that McCarthy was not negligent himself in adhering to any of the safety procedures (e. g. wearing safety harness etc. ). Hence we can assume that there was no contributory negligence on the part of McCarthy. This, in turn, is also not likely as it was not stated in the facts of the case. We can also assume that BCA will also not be held liable to any extent at all, as the onus of ensuring the day-to-day safety of the ride system is on FDA. In a nutshell, from our points of evaluation, we can conclude that the the court will most likely rule that FDA was negligent, be it in verifying the physical safety of the system, or verifying the true safety limits of the system. In committing an act of negligence, the FDA’s exemption clause will be rendered invalid, by virtue of section 2(1) of the UCTA. On these grounds alone, FDA will likely hold liability for McCarthy’s injuries. In addition, FDA’s negligence can also be ruled out to be in breach of the implied duty of care. On these separate grounds alone, it is also likely that FDA can hold liability for McCarthy’s injuries. As such, we can conclude that the likely legal outcome will be that FDA will be held liable for McCarthy’s recoverable losses. If ruled in McCarthy’s favor, it is likely that operations of the ride will be suspended until all investigations and modifications to the ride have been made and verified to be safe. By section 30 of ARSA, FDA â€Å"shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $10,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both†. FDA would also be held liable for all costs with regards to McCarthy’s personal injury.

The Fab Five :: Essays Papers

The Fab Five Women of Today in Arizona Politics The women of the state of Arizona have always played a significant role in politics. Before most women even had the right to vote, two women from Arizona, Frances Munds and Rachel Berry, were the first women elected into the state legislature. Today, Arizona has the highest percentage of women in the state legislature. More impressive is the fact that Arizona is the first state ever to have an all-female elected line of succession. There is no doubt that these five women greatly contributed to making 1997 the "Year of the Woman," where there was a dramatic increase in women's representation in the House and Senate. Why women in Arizona have flourished in the political arena and continue to do so is a question our group will try to answer in our research. More specifically, I will discuss women in current Arizona politics. In reviewing the role of women in current politics today, I will discuss the reasons as to why women have such strong political power in the state of Arizona, a nd the difference, between the views of voters in Arizona and other states. I will also discuss not only the future of women in Arizona politics but the future of women in national politics as well, and what to expect as the new millenium approaches. It is no coincidence that Arizona’s five highest offices are held by women. These women, Governor Jane Hull, Secretary of State Betsey Bayless, Attorney General Janet Napolitano, Treasurer Carol Springer, and Superintendent of Public Instruction Lisa Keegan, did not simply win these elections because they are women. All of them are experienced, highly educated, intelligent people who worked hard to get to the top. In an interview, Council Member Janet Marcus stated that these women have outstanding experience and background, and though being women may have helped them, it is their credentials that won the elections. The five women elected agree that it was not an issue of gender but rather of who was most qualified for the job. Lisa Graham Keegan was actually pleased at the small attention given to the gender issues. She said, â€Å"It really wasn’t about voting for women. It just happened that these women ran for office and won† (Khoury 2). Governor Hull ag reed with Keegan, â€Å"You see a group of women who have all been in government, are all experienced, who all ran very positive campaigns.

Responsibilities of Sports Engineers

Responsibilities of Sports Engineers Sports is something that attracts every person in this world towards itself. Sports has become a very common field that everybody has interested in. People are gaining more and more interest in different sports from all over the world. And that is why sports engineering is gaining significance and recognition. It is a special field of engineering, which involves everything from the development to the testing of the different sports equipment. The discipline includes numerous activities and everything related to sports and sports equipment.The sports engineers have several responsibilities that are discussed here at length. The very first responsibility of a sports engineer is the designing of the sports equipment. With the development of different sports and an increase in their popularity, people are eager to make use of the best of the sports equipment. And this is where the sports engineers can contribute by developing new equipment that would help the athletes perform better. Sports engineers are also responsible for carrying out a complete lab and experimental testing of the sports equipment, athletes and the interaction between them.This is one of the most important parts of the job of a sports engineer because it is not possible to make use of anything without testing the equipment and the nature of interactions the users would have with the equipment. The sports engineers not only carry out laboratory testing but are also required to test the performance of the athletes and different devices in the field, i. e. the environment of the sports. Field testing needs to be completely accurate so that there is no scope of mistakes and the athletes are prepared to use their equipment in the real conditions and situations.Computational modeling has been used only for scientific purposes till now. Computational modeling approach is usually employed in physics and other scientific applications, whether it is fluid dynamics or a ny other experiment. Sports engineers are also making use of this technique and approach for determining the forces acting upon the working of the equipment and for stimulating its working before actually developing them. Sports engineers also need to continuously work with the different government bodies and the authorities for making sure that the rules are adhered to and everything is carried out within the pre-defined guidelines.Sports engineers also have to work with the athletes to regularly keep a track and improve the performance of the different athletes in different fields. They need to find out new ways and measures for enhancing the performance of the sportsmen. Thus, we see that sports engineers are extremely important people and they need to carry out all of their responsibilities sincerely for the development of different sports and for the betterment of the athletes. Reference link: http://classof1. com/homework-help/engineering-homework-help

Identify the Corporate Strategy of the Clothing Retailer Zara

Identify the corporate strategy of the clothing retailer ZARA and discuss how the five operations performance objectives support Zara’s corporate strategy. In addition explain the external benefits of these five objectives. Zara is the clothing retailer the best known as a brand of Spanish holding group Inditex (Industrias de Diseno Textil). First Zara store was opened in 1975,in Spain by Inditex father and founder Amancio Ortegas Gaona. It was first step and strong foundation to his success. Zara became most successful brand in fashion industry and it keeps growing and expanding constantly. There are 1721 Zara stores in 87 countries all over the world. All offer great catwalk fashion clothes for reasonable prices. The triumph†¦show more content†¦At the same time staff monitor customer choices, check which garments are the most popular and which are not liked at all, which are asked to be in different colour. Shop assistants asking customers what their expectations are or what design they like the best and which one should come back on the store retail. Thus most of the designs are based on the customer’s preferences not the fashion specialists. All this information is sent to The C ube – main building of Inditex, where in contrast to other retailer, around 30.000 items is produced per year. This information forwarded from staff to managers, in next step is sent off to headquarters in Spain. The report from daily sales, gives opportunity to check immediately which line are less popular and they are quickly removed from rails. The data collected from customers in stores is being treated as first-hand information, it reports demand for a new garments with different suggestion or information of the most popular line, which is added in quick turnaround. Store managers and working staff are the channel with information between the customers, control centre and the creative teams in Spain. The teams there must make sure that all needs and expectation of customers will be met. Manager report collected informationShow MoreRelatedZara Operational Performance2583 Words   |  11 Pagesï » ¿Essay Question: Identify the corporate strategy of the clothing retailer Zara and discuss how the five operations performance objectives support Zara’s corporate strategy. In addition explain the external benefits of these five objectives. Words: 2597 ZARA INTRODUCTION Zara is Spanish clothing and accessories retailer part of the holding group Inditex which is one of the world’s largest fashion groups. At the close of 2012, Zara had 1,925 stores in its eight sales formats in 86 marketsRead MoreZara Case Study : Zara Case2492 Words   |  10 Pages Zara Case Study Name Academic Institution Zara Case Study Executive Summary This case study (Ghemawat, Nueno, Dailey, 2003) of the Spanish retail apparel company Zara, one of the six retail brands owned by Spanish company Inditex, focused on a number of issues confronting the retailer. These issues arose mainly from the consideration that Zara defied many of the dynamics of the retail apparel market. Zara, unlike its competitors, owned most of its production as well as itsRead MoreExpansion of the Spanish Clothing Retailer Zara in5051 Words   |  21 PagesExpansion of the Spanish clothing retailer Zara in India Executive Summary   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   The main goal of this report is to analyze the environment how Zara wil be marketed and launched in India. Analysis shows that the main problem of the product is to in terms of making the target market know the existence of the product in the country and the competition of the current clothing lines available in the market.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   In order to solve such complexities, the solution is to implement strategicRead MoreZara Strategy4700 Words   |  19 PagesIntroduction * Definition of terms * Strategy The primary goal of strategy is to outline long term plans a company would undertake taking into consideration several factors which affect its business environment. It is in other words a broad-based formula for how a business is going to accomplish its mission, what its goals should be and what plans and policies will be needed to carry out those goals. * E commerce The online environment is flooded with a lot of transactional activitiesRead MorePorters Analysis of Zara Essay1934 Words   |  8 PagesMGT136- Management Themes and Perspectives Strategy MGT136-1 Provide an analysis of an organisation explaining the relative importance of each of Porter’s Five Forces for the organisation’s strategic position. You should support your arguments with evidence from the company and/or the relevant literature. Zara has been the major pioneer of ‘disposable’ fashion; which makes up over 12% of the UK clothing industry. Zara outperforms its rivals in profitability, brand identity, and its successfulRead MoreThe Analysis of Zara4664 Words   |  19 PagesThe market analysis of ZARA ______________________________________________ Student Name: Xia Tang Student Number:139151583 Tutor: Steve Storey Module Leader: Sudipta Das Word Count:4005 Date of submission: 16th June 2014 Contents Introduction of ZARA 1 1 Dynamics and trends within the marketing environment of ZARA. 1 1.1 Introduction of marketing environment 2 1.2 Macroenvironment-----PESTLE analysis of ZARA 2 1.3 Microenvironment analysis of ZARA 4 1.4 Poter’s threeRead MoreMerchandising: Zara Hmv3135 Words   |  13 Pagessystem is essential to the success of any retail business. I intend to focus this merchandising report on Zara, a ladies fashion retailer and HMV, an entertainment megastore. These two companies have specific buying and merchandising strategies, which are tailored to the needs of their products. This report will explore the similarities and differences within each company s strategies, and identify factors that determine them. Range Selection and Planning When selecting merchandise it needs to beRead MoreZara vs. Uniqlo Essay6859 Words   |  28 Pages   Clothing Industry       ZARA vs. UNIQLO Team   J:    Bingbing   Ge    Lei   Du    Sophia   Maduka    Salman   Syed   Azim    Thanadol   Boonyaviwat    Tanya   Goel    1           Index Content Page Number Executive Summary†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦... 4 Introduction†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 5 Industry Analysis†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦5 Competitive Environment†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.5 Strategic Groups†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.Read MoreCase Study Of Zara As An Organization1878 Words   |  8 Pagesproduc ts with added value for their customers in order to beat out their competitors and stay ahead of the competition. There are also other factors which influence the success of marketing of a company. The purpose of this study is going to review Zara as an organization and provide recommend on how it can take the market-orientation concept and apply it, also, benefits involved in adopting the principle, and challenges that may occur while implementing this concept. 1.1 Market orientation MarketRead MoreZara: a Marketing Analysis Case Study5929 Words   |  24 PagesThis assignment identifies an organization portraying superior performance and then analyses the marketing concepts, marketing environment and marketing mix, and identifies critical success factors. THE ORGANISATION Dubbed by The Economist (Fashion Forward -The Economist, 2012) as Spain’s most successful brand, my organization is ZARA. Based in La Coruna, Spain, Zara is Inditex’s main brand, (Fashion Forward -The Economist, 2012). Founded in 1975 by Amancio Ortega Zara now has stores in